Navy Wants to Retire First Four, Still Almost New, Littoral Combat Ships

In its recent budget proposal, the Navy announced its intention to retire the first four Littoral Combat Ships (LCS)  — the USS Freedom, USS IndependenceUSS Fort Worth, and USS Coronado — which range in age from twelve to only six years old.  

The LCS were supposed to be cheap, flexible and multipurpose vessels capable of operating primarily in coastal waters. They have turned out to be expensive, unreliable and incapable of doing anything well. Many in the blue-water Navy refer to the LCS as “Little Crappy Ships.”  The LCS have been described as the program that broke the Navy

Originally, the plan was to build 55 LCS of two very different designs. The number has been cut to 34, with 19 commissioned and 15 more under construction. The Freedom-class, a semi-planing steel monohull with an aluminum superstructure, has suffered chronic engine and gear failures as well as structural hull cracking. The Independence-class, an aluminum high-speed trimaran, has suffered serious corrosion problems as well as propulsion failures. 

The two LCS classes have set new records for failures. On its first deployment in 2013, the USS Freedom barely made it across the Pacific to Singapore after repeated electronic and mechanical failures. Once it reached Singapore it spent most of its time being repaired. 

In 2016, the three Freedom-class LCS in service achieved a 100% failure rate, each suffering major engine or propulsion gear failures. In 2018, of the eleven LCS commissioned, not one was capable of being deployed. Maintnecen and repairs kept the ships tied to the docks.

The first four LCS ships were effectively withdrawn from service for use as testing and training ships in 2016. Now, the Navy wants to retire them entirely. What the Navy will do with the other 30 or so LCS commissioned or under construction is unclear.   

Thanks to Bob Koski for contributing to this post.

Comments

Navy Wants to Retire First Four, Still Almost New, Littoral Combat Ships — 12 Comments

  1. They should tie one up at Washington Navy Yard; one at Annapolis;
    One at each of the Company facilities; one in front of the Designers’ shops.
    Each of them with a billboard of their failings prominently displayed in public view.

    They should march midshipmen through once a quarter, Admirals through once a month, Shipbuilders twice a year, and require Naval Architects and Engineers to live aboard for a month.

    Strip the rest of anything useful, and make power barges of them, laid up in Hurricane prone ports.

  2. This reeks of “go back and do it again”. As well as some ones pockets are well lined. So four ships didnt make the grade and they are continuing to build more? May as well toss the aluminum for kevlar.

    Yup some one is willing to screw us americans on this.

  3. Wasn’t the original plan to build two of each type as prototypes and then decide which to build in series, rather than build two series?

  4. @Dick B
    excellent idea! let’s do one of those government petitions for that, hahaha

    @Willy
    “us americans” are screwing us americans, alas

  5. Your approach would have made sense. The Navy went full speed ahead with the two very different designs before either was fully engineered. There never has been a good explanation that I am aware of. Hubris, pork-barrel politics, stupidity? Who knows.

  6. Littoral Combat Ship 19 delivered To US Navy
    Lockheed Martin and Fincantieri Marinette Marine have delivered the future USS St. Louis, Littoral Combat Ship 19, to the U.S. Navy.

    “With LCS 19’s delivery, the U.S. Navy has 10 Freedom-variant Littoral Combat Ships in the fleet. LCS 7 recently deployed, and it is gratifying to know that our team has delivered a ship that is relevant for today’s fight and that is needed around the world,” said Joe DePietro, Lockheed Martin vice president and general manager, Small Combatants and Ship Systems.

    Continues at: https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/littoral-combat-ship-19-delivered-to-us-navy/?no_cache=1&fbclid=IwAR2GbJ5XQh6TjP3RiRL4gWHx1dvovZOVW-f80t7Rd0l6-dpI5wFavuLV29s9

  7. I never understood why this project was continued and more taxpayer money was poured into these when they found design faults, construction faults, continued cost over runs and price increases for ships that additionally were proven not to able to perform the tasks that they were going to be assigned to complete. Complete boondoggle by the Navy, the Pentagon procurement department, the Department of Defense and Congress for ever funding this ( oh yea, pork for their constituents, what was I thinking). Another massive taxpayer fraud.